Lord of the Flies — symbols, allegory, and the descent into savagery

William Golding · 1954

William Golding's Lord of the Flies is the most read English-language novel about how easily civilization breaks down. Written in the aftermath of the Second World War by a man who had served in the Royal Navy and seen what he could not unsee, the novel is at once an adventure story, a careful allegory, and an argument about human nature. To read it well, you need to hold all three registers at once.

The premise as inversion

Golding wrote the novel partly in response to R. M. Ballantyne's The Coral Island (1857), a Victorian boys' adventure story in which British schoolboys stranded on an island establish order, civilization, and Christian morality. Golding kept the premise — boys, an island, no adults — and inverted the conclusion. The argument: Ballantyne's vision is wishful thinking; the actual outcome would be more like what happens in this novel. The intertextual joke (the rescuing naval officer at the end is explicitly a Coral Island figure) is part of the book's deep critique.

The central allegory

The novel's surface is an adventure story; its depth is an allegory of human society and the institutions that hold it together. Each major character is, in the strict sense, a type:

Ralph — democratic order, fragile legitimacy, the rule-of-law impulse. He has authority because of the conch; when the conch breaks, his authority breaks with it.
Piggy — reason, science, rational argument. He has Mafia-glasses (used to start the fire) and asthma (he cannot run from violence). He is murdered when the rule of reason fails.
Jack — charismatic authoritarianism, the politics of fear and ritualized violence. He offers meat, face-paint, and the dissolution of individual responsibility.
Simon — the mystic, the prophet, the Christ-figure. He is the only character who understands what the "beast" actually is. He is killed by the others while trying to deliver his message.
Roger — sadism unconstrained. Where Jack institutionalizes violence, Roger enjoys it.

The novel is not subtle about its allegory, and Golding's later interviews confirm the design. Each character represents a force in human society; the plot is the story of which forces win when the institutional containers (school, family, law) are removed.

The conch as symbol

The conch shell is the novel's central symbol. It is found in chapter one and used to summon the boys; whoever holds it has the right to speak; its blowing is the audible mark of collective decision-making. Its gradual loss of authority — and its eventual shattering by the boulder that kills Piggy — is the narrative line of the novel's central thesis. When the conch breaks, democracy on the island is over.

The beast as motif

The boys' fear of "the beast" runs through the novel. They believe it is an animal hiding on the island; some think it is a ghost; the reader's awareness, as the novel progresses, is that "the beast" is what they themselves are becoming. Simon's encounter with the rotting pig's head — the "Lord of the Flies" of the title — gives the novel its name and its thesis. The head, swarming with flies, tells Simon (in his hallucinated fever): "Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill!" The beast is inside.

The naming

"Lord of the Flies" is a literal translation of the Hebrew Ba'al Zebub (Beelzebub) — a name for the devil. Golding is not subtle about the religious frame either. The novel is, in one reading, a secular fall narrative: a paradise (the unspoiled island), an innocence (the boys before face-paint), a temptation, and a corruption. The garden's name is also the devil's.

The descent in stages

Track the novel's progression by what gets abandoned at each stage:

Names — the boys retain their proper names early, then become "hunters," then are addressed by face-paint markings.
Clothes — uniforms degrade, then are shed.
The signal fire — established as the symbol of the desire to be rescued, gradually neglected, eventually allowed to die.
The conch's authority — initially respected, increasingly ignored, finally shattered.
Reason itself — Piggy's voice becomes progressively less audible to the others.

Golding's argument is that civilization is not a stable state but a thin layer of habit and institution; remove the institutions and the layer thins to nothing.

The naval officer ending

The novel ends with the boys being rescued by a British naval officer who has come ashore from a warship. The irony is sharp. The officer is appalled at the boys' "savagery." But he is himself in the middle of a war (the novel's background is a nuclear conflict). His own institution is doing, at industrial scale, the same thing the boys have just done at miniature scale. Ralph weeps "for the end of innocence, the darkness of man's heart" — and the officer turns away, embarrassed, to look at his cruiser. Golding's last move is to refuse the consolation of rescue.

Themes

The thinness of civilization. What we think of as the natural state of human society is in fact an artifact, sustainable only by institutional pressure.
The role of charisma in authoritarianism. Jack's rise is a study in how violence and ritualized belonging defeat reasoned argument.
The scapegoat. Simon's killing is a ritualized murder of the truth-teller. The novel borrows from anthropological accounts of scapegoating to make its argument.
The unreliability of progress. Written in the shadow of Auschwitz and Hiroshima, the novel rejects the Enlightenment story of progressive improvement. We are not, the novel says, what we tell ourselves we are.

Try Lexio

Look up any word like this — in any book, in any browser.

Lexio is a free Chrome extension and web app that reads a word's actual context and tells you what it means in this sentence, not from a generic dictionary.

Try Lexio — free →