Albert Camus · 1942
Albert Camus's L'Étranger (published in English as The Stranger in America and The Outsider in Britain) is the canonical novel of European existentialism in its specifically Camusian form. Written in occupied France in 1940–41 and published in 1942, the novel is short, formally cool, and built around a single philosophical argument made through a single character whose behaviour the surrounding society cannot tolerate.
The novel's first sentence is one of the most analyzed in twentieth-century fiction:
Aujourd'hui, maman est morte. Ou peut-être hier, je ne sais pas.
"Today, mother died. Or yesterday maybe, I don't know."
Three features matter. First, the flat declarative tone — no emotional adjective attached to the central event. Second, the use of "maman" (the familiar diminutive) rather than the more formal "mère" — translated awkwardly to English, where "mother" is too cold and "mommy" too childish. Most English translations have settled on "Maman." Third, the uncertainty: the protagonist literally does not know which day she died. This is not callousness; it is the announcement of a narrator whose relationship to conventional emotional categories is defective.
Meursault narrates the entire novel in first person, in short declarative sentences that report what he perceives and does without emotional commentary. The events of the novel — his mother's funeral, his brief affair with Marie, his involvement with his neighbour Raymond, his shooting of an unnamed Arab on a beach — are delivered with the same flat attention. Meursault does not lie; he reports.
The narration is the novel's central formal achievement. Camus is showing what a consciousness that has stripped itself of conventional emotional and moral interpretation actually looks like. The reader's discomfort — the sense that Meursault should be feeling things he is not feeling — is the novel's working surface.
The novel's recurring motif is the Algerian sun. Heat, glare, sweat, the inability to think clearly under direct sun — these register through every important scene. The funeral is hot; the beach is hot; the moment of the shooting is described primarily in terms of the sun:
The sun was the same as it had been the day I'd buried Maman, and like then, my forehead especially was hurting, all the veins in it throbbing under the skin. It was this burning, which I couldn't stand anymore, that made me move forward.
The sun is doing work no human character can. It is the Algerian environment as participant in the action — physical, indifferent, inescapable. Meursault's most consequential act (the shooting) is presented not as a moral choice but as a movement compelled by heat.
The novel is the literary companion to Camus's philosophical essay The Myth of Sisyphus (1942). Both books make the case for the absurd: the mismatch between the human demand for meaning and the universe's silence about it. Meursault is the absurd man — someone who has stopped pretending the universe has meaning and lives accordingly.
For Camus, the absurd is not nihilism. The absurd man is not against meaning; they are honest about its absence. The question is what to do given that absence. The Myth of Sisyphus argues that one must "imagine Sisyphus happy" — that lucidity about absurdity is itself a form of victory. The Stranger dramatizes the position.
The novel's second half is Meursault's trial for the killing. The prosecution's argument is not, primarily, about the killing. It is about Meursault's failure to weep at his mother's funeral. The court finds him guilty not because the evidence proves murder but because he is a stranger to the emotional conventions society demands.
This is the novel's political argument. Camus is showing a judicial system that punishes the wrong thing: the public emotional performance that society requires, rather than the act itself. The book is partly an attack on the death penalty (Meursault is condemned to be guillotined) and partly an attack on the way social judgment substitutes itself for moral judgment.
The novel's emotional climax — the only moment Meursault loses his composure — is his confrontation with the prison chaplain who comes to convert him before his execution. Meursault, who has been calm throughout, suddenly explodes at the chaplain, refusing the consolation of religion. The speech that follows is the novel's most direct statement of the absurdist position: nothing matters except the specific material life one has had, the specific sensations one has felt, the specific people one has known. The transcendent frame the chaplain offers is a lie.
Meursault then has a moment of paradoxical peace: lying in his cell, "for the first time, I opened myself to the gentle indifference of the world." The phrase is one of the most famous in twentieth-century literature. The indifference is not horrifying; it is the universe being honestly itself, and Meursault's recognition of it is the form of acceptance Camus calls happiness.
The novel ends with Meursault preparing to be executed, hoping for "a large crowd of spectators on the day of my execution, and that they greet me with cries of hate." The line is one of the strangest closings in modern fiction. The absurd man wants the crowd's hatred not from masochism but because the hatred would confirm the relationship Meursault has to the social order — they are strangers to each other, and the hatred is the honest form of that relationship.
One of the novel's most contested features: the man Meursault kills is identified throughout only as "the Arab." He has no name, no inner life, no reported speech. The critical literature on this — particularly Edward Said's postcolonial reading and Kamel Daoud's 2013 novel Meursault, contre-enquête (which retells the story from the dead man's brother's perspective) — has made the political dimension of the original novel impossible to ignore.
The novel's flat indifference to its victim's identity is not the novel's absent-mindedness; it is the colonial frame the novel inhabits and partially critiques without fully confronting. Reading The Stranger now means reading it with this knowledge.
Lexio is a free Chrome extension and web app that reads a word's actual context and tells you what it means in this sentence, not from a generic dictionary.
Try Lexio — free →
Read deeper. Understand everything.
© 2026 Lexio · Privacy · Credits