A term you'll meet in literary theory and poetic tradition.
In The Anxiety of Influence (1973), Harold Bloom proposed one of the most provocative theories in literary criticism: that strong poets do not simply learn from their great predecessors; they struggle against them, misread them, distort them — and that this struggle is not a failure but the very mechanism by which originality is achieved. The concept reshaped how critics think about tradition, influence, and poetic identity.
Every strong poet, Bloom argues, begins in the shadow of a poetic father — a precursor whose power is so overwhelming that the young poet risks being "devoured," reduced to mere imitation. To become a poet in his own right, the latecomer must perform what Bloom calls a "creative misreading" (clinamen, one of his six revisionary ratios): a deliberate swerve away from the precursor, a reading of the earlier poet that is in some sense wrong but in another sense necessary. The strong poet does not faithfully absorb and transmit the tradition; he warps it to create room for himself.
Bloom draws heavily on Freud: the relationship between poet and precursor is Oedipal. The latecomer must, symbolically, kill the father — not through rejection but through a more violent act, the act of appropriation and deformation that makes the precursor seem to have anticipated the latecomer rather than the other way around. Bloom calls this "apophrades" (the return of the dead): the uncanny effect where the strong poet, having absorbed and transformed his precursor, makes the earlier work look as if it were influenced by him.
Bloom identifies six ways poets swerve from their precursors, giving them deliberately obscure Greek and Kabbalistic names. The most useful to know:
Milton and Shakespeare: Bloom argues that Milton's Paradise Lost is in part a massive swerve from Shakespeare — a poem that claims the epic tradition as a counter-tradition to the drama that Shakespeare had dominated. Milton had to suppress Shakespeare to write his poem.
Keats and Milton: Keats's Hyperion begins in full Miltonic grandeur and then, in the revised Fall of Hyperion, collapses that mode under the pressure of the poet's own consciousness. The revision is Bloom's clinamen in action: Keats swerves from Milton by dramatizing the cost of the Miltonic stance.
Emerson and Whitman: Bloom sees Whitman as the great American example. Song of Myself is a creative misreading of Emerson — it takes Emerson's prose vision of the democratic self and inflates it into a cosmic poetic persona that makes Emerson seem a mere precursor.
The theory has been criticized on several fronts. It is relentlessly masculinist: Bloom builds his argument around a canon of strong male poets, and critics have pointed out that the Oedipal model of struggle and parricide applies poorly to women writers, who historically had to struggle not against overwhelming precursors but against the absence of any tradition at all. Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar's response, The Madwoman in the Attic, argues that women writers faced an "anxiety of authorship" — a question of whether they had the right to write at all — that is structurally different from Bloom's anxiety.
Bloom also applies the theory mainly to post-Miltonic English poetry. Its applicability to fiction, drama, or non-Western traditions is much less clear.
Despite its limits, the anxiety of influence changed how critics talk about tradition. Before Bloom, influence was often discussed as a matter of "sources" — one poet borrowing from another. After Bloom, the question became psychodynamic: how does a writer struggle with a predecessor? How does the precursor's power get converted into the latecomer's originality? These are richer and harder questions, and Bloom's vocabulary — swerve, misreading, apophrades — gives you a set of precise tools for asking them.
Lexio is a free Chrome extension and web app that reads a word's actual context and tells you what it means in this sentence, not from a generic dictionary.
Try Lexio — free →
Read deeper. Understand everything.
© 2026 Lexio · Privacy · Credits